“To Carol who willed it”: On Carol and John Steinbeck

This post was contributed by Small Special Collections Library Curator George Riser.

Carol Henning met John Steinbeck in June 1928 at Lake Tahoe, where Steinbeck was working at a fish hatchery. They fell “instantly” in love; Carol’s friend Idell, who introduced them, wrote in a letter to a friend, “John fell upon Carol like a bear coming out of hibernation would fall upon a fresh beef steak.” They married in January 1930, and Carol and John began scratching out a living while Steinbeck (with Carol’s inestimable assistance) went about with his writing.    

In an early short story entitled “Saint Katy the Virgin” (PS3537.T3234 S2 1936) Steinbeck writes of a medieval time where two brothers from a monastery approach a farmer for his mandatory tithe. The farmer, angry at being forced to tithe, gives the brothers Katy, his most disagreeable pig—a pig so ornery, he soon chases the two brothers up a tree. One of the brothers dangles his iron crucifix over the pig, exorcising the devil that was presumed to be making Katy so violent. Immediately, the pig is calmed and goes willingly to the monastery, where they face the angry Father who explains that, as Katy is now a Christian, she cannot be eaten. The Father notes, “There are plenty of Christians. This year there’s a great shortage of pigs.” Katy goes on to live a contemplative existence, and crowds come from afar to seek her benedictions.

The story was published in December 1936 by Covici-Friede in a fine press edition of 199 copies. A presentation copy to Carol is held in the Clifton Waller Barrett Library in the University of Virginia Special Collections Library. The inscription reads: “To Carol pig beautiful sowie from J. Ernst Pig.”

Throughout their marriage, Steinbeck acknowledged Carol’s inspiration and assistance in writing his stories and novels. His masterpiece The Grapes of Wrath (PS3537 .T3234 G8 1939), a title chosen by Carol, published in 1939, is dedicated “To Carol who willed it.” The Clifton Waller Barrett Library holds the presentation copy of the first printing of The Grapes of Wrath with a holograph inscription to Carol in the private language they used for purposes of intimacy.

Our best interpretation of that inscription, with the help of AI:

One Carol equal one everything
The cycle and equal misery
So love and stay around
One Carol equal and equal.

Sog [Steinbeck’s nickname]
John Steinbeck
Los Gatos in the evening.

The holograph manuscript for The Grapes of Wrath is also held in the Barrett Library. The first leaf has the heading, “New Start, Big Writing.” Carol had agreed to make a typescript from the manuscript copy if Steinbeck would make his hand more legible in the final draft. One can see from the first leaf to the fourth that Steinbeck’s best intentions at “big writing” did not last beyond the third leaf.  

Trouble inevitably follows great success, and John and Carol divorced in 1943. (For further reading, see Susan Shillinglaw, Carol & John Steinbeck: Portrait of a Marriage (University of Nevada Press, 2013). (PS3537.T3234 Z8664 2013)) 

A Poem Unearthed: Walt Whitman’s “Live Oak with Moss”

Section I of "Live Oak with Moss" laid against a teal background.
Section I of “Live Oak with Moss” manuscript in Walt Whitman’s hand, n.d. (Photo courtesy of Lathan Goumas, University Communications)

This post was contributed by Small Special Collections Library Curator George Riser.

Walt Whitman self-published Leaves of Grass in 1855 in a collection of twelve poems. Encouraged by a letter from Ralph Waldo Emerson, Whitman released a second edition a year later in 1856; this edition included thirty-two poems. A third edition followed in 1860, and the book now boasted 156 poems. The poems added to the 1860 edition exist in Whitman’s hand, and these edited manuscript poems (part of MSS 3829) are housed in the Clifton Waller Barrett Library of American Literature at the University of Virginia Special Collections Library.  

In 1956, Fredson Bowers, a University of Virginia English professor, examined the manuscript poems and noted that scattered throughout the “Calamus” section was a set of twelve numbered poems, all written on the same white-wove paper and obviously fair copies (final versions after all corrections and revisions have been made). Placing the poems in numerical order for the first time since the 1860 edition was published, Bowers saw that these twelve poems made a single long poem entitled “Live Oak with Moss,” and that Whitman’s intent in these poems was to express his feeling about “the manly love of comrades.”  

16 pieces of white paper labeled in sections with roman numerals from 1-12, featuring Whitman's handwriting in dark ink.
Here, the twelve manuscript sections have been digitally stitched together. Notice the “IX” that was sliced in half when pages 12 and 13 were cut. Walt Whitman, “Live Oak with Moss” manuscript sections, n.d. (MSS 3829)

In Bower’s 1956 article in Studies in Bibliography, “Whitman’s Manuscript for the original ‘Calamus Poems,’” Bowers noted that Whitman’s first symbol of “manly love” was the live oak. Bowers described the poems in their original sequence as appearing deeply personal and candid and having been written about love and disappointment in a relationship between two men—an insight that had been much speculated upon, but, as Bower concludes, “here in these manuscripts is the proof.” 

As Whitman had much to fear in his lifetime when making clear his feelings about homosexual love, he made the decision to scatter the twelve sections throughout the “Calamus” cluster to obscure his original intent.

Shown below are images of the original “Live Oak with Moss” manuscript poem in Whitman’s original sequence. 

  • Section I, page 1.“ Live Oak with Moss” has been crossed out, and “Calamus Leaves” is written above that.
  • Section II, page 2.
  • Section II, page 3.
  • Section III, page 4.
  • Section III, page 5.
  • Section IV, page 6.
  • Section V, page 7.
  • Section V, page 8.
  • Section V, page 8.5.
  • Section VI, page 9.
  • Section VII, page 9.5, of Live Oak with Moss manuscript.
  • Section VII, page 10.
  • Section VIII, page 11.
  • Section VIII, page 12.
  • Section IX, page 13.
  • Section X, page 14.
  • Section XI, page 15.
  • Section XII, page 16.

Full poem, courtesy of the Whitman Archive:

“Live Oak with Moss”

l

Not heat flames up and consumes,
Not sea-waves hurry in and out,
Not the air, delicious and dry, the air of the ripe
     summer, bears lightly along white down-balls of
     myriads of seeds, wafted, sailing gracefully, to drop
     where they may,
Not these—O none of these, more than the flames of
     me, consuming, burning for his love whom I love!
O none, more than I, hurrying in and out;
Does the tide hurry, seeking something, and never give
     up? O I the same;
O nor down-balls, nor perfumes, nor the high rain-
     emitting clouds, are borne through the open air,
Any more than my Soul is borne through the open air,
Wafted in all directions, O love, for friendship, for you.

2

I saw in Louisiana a live-oak growing,
All alone stood it, and the moss hung down from the
     branches,
Without any companion it grew there, uttering joyous
     leaves of dark green,
And its look, rude, unbending, lusty, made me think of
     myself,
But I wondered how it could utter joyous leaves,
     standing alone there, without its friend, its lover
     near—for I knew I could not,
And I broke off a twig with a certain number of leaves
     upon it, and twined around it a little moss,
And brought it away—and I have placed it in sight in
     my room,
It is not needed to remind me as of my own dear
     friends,
(For I believe lately I think of little else than of them,)
Yet it remains to me a curious token—it makes me think
     of manly love;
For all that, and though the live-oak glistens there in
     Louisiana, solitary, in a wide flat space,
Uttering joyous leaves all its life, without a friend, a
     lover, near,
I know very well I could not.

3

When I heard at the close of the day how my name had
     been received with plaudits in the capitol, still it was
     not a happy night for me that followed;
And else, when I caroused, or when my plans were
     accomplished, still I was not happy;
But the day when I rose at dawn from the bed of perfect
     health, refreshed, singing, inhaling the ripe breath of
     autumn,
When I saw the full moon in the west grow pale and
     disappear in the morning light,
When I wandered alone over the beach, and,
     undressing, bathed, laughing with the cool waters,
     and saw the sun rise,
And when I thought how my dear friend, my lover, was
     on his way coming, O then I was happy;
O then each breath tasted sweeter—and all that day my
     food nourished me more—And the beautiful day
     passed well,
And the next came with equal joy—And with the next,
     at evening, came my friend;
And that night, while all was still, I heard the waters roll
     slowly continually up the shores,
I heard the hissing rustle of the liquid and sands, as
     directed to me, whispering, to congratulate me,
For the one I love most lay sleeping by me under the
     same cover in the cool night,
In the stillness, in the autumn moonbeams, his face was
     inclined toward me,
And his arm lay lightly around my breast—And that
     night I was happy.

4

This moment as I sit alone, yearning and thoughtful, it
     seems to me there are other men in other lands,
     yearning and thoughtful;
It seems to me I can look over and behold them, in
     Germany, Italy, France, Spain—Or far, far away, in
     China, or in Russia or India—talking other dialects;
And it seems to me if I could know those men better, I
     should become attached to them, as I do to men in
     my own lands,
It seems to me they are as wise, beautiful, benevolent,
     as any in my own lands;
O I know we should be brethren and lovers,
I know I should be happy with them.

5

Long I thought that knowledge alone would suffice
     me—O if I could but obtain knowledge!
Then my lands engrossed me—Lands of the prairies,
     Ohio’s land, the southern savannas, engrossed me—
     For them I would live—I would be their orator;
Then I met the examples of old and new heroes—I
     heard of warriors, sailors, and all dauntless persons—
     And it seemed to me that I too had it in me to be as
     dauntless as any—and would be so;
And then, to enclose all, it came to me to strike up the
     songs of the New World—And then I believed my life
     must be spent in singing;
But now take notice, land of the prairies, land of the
     south savannas, Ohio’s land,
Take notice, you Kanuck woods—and you Lake
     Huron—and all that with you roll toward Niagara—
     and you Niagara also,
And you, Californian mountains—That you each and all
     find somebody else to be your singer of songs,
For I can be your singer of songs no longer—One who
     loves me is jealous of me, and withdraws me from all
     but love,
With the rest I dispense—I sever from what I thought
     would suffice me, for it does not—it is now empty
     and tasteless to me,
I heed knowledge, and the grandeur of The States, and
     the example of heroes, no more,
I am indifferent to my own songs—I will go with him I
     love,
It is to be enough for us that we are together—We never
     separate again.

6

What think you I take my pen in hand to record?
The battle-ship, perfect-model’d, majestic, that I saw
     pass the offing to-day under full sail?
The splendors of the past day? Or the splendor of the
     night that envelops me?
Or the vaunted glory and growth of the great city
     spread around me?—No;
But I record of two simple men I saw to-day, on the pier,
     in the midst of the crowd, parting the parting of dear
     friends,
The one to remain hung on the other’s neck, and
     passionately kissed him,
While the one to depart, tightly prest the one to remain
     in his arms.

7

You bards of ages hence! when you refer to me, mind
     not so much my poems,
Nor speak of me that I prophesied of The States, and led
     them the way of their glories;
But come, I will take you down underneath this
     impassive exterior—I will tell you what to say of me:
Publish my name and hang up my picture as that of the
     tenderest lover
The friend, the lover’s portrait, of whom his friend, his
     lover, was fondest,
Who was not proud of his songs, but of the measureless
     ocean of love within him—and freely poured it forth,
Who often walked lonesome walks, thinking of his dear
     friends, his lovers,
Who pensive, away from one he loved, often lay
     sleepless and dissatisfied at night,
Who knew too well the sick, sick dread lest the one he
     loved might secretly be indifferent to him,
Whose happiest days were far away, through fields, in
     woods, on hills, he and another, wandering hand in
     hand, they twain, apart from other men,
Who oft as he sauntered the streets, curved with his
     arm the shoulder of his friend—while the arm of his
     friend rested upon him also.

8

Hours continuing long, sore and heavy-hearted,
Hours of the dusk, when I withdraw to a lonesome and
     unfrequented spot, seating myself, leaning my face in
     my hands;
Hours sleepless, deep in the night, when I go forth,
     speeding swiftly the country roads, or through the
     city streets, or pacing miles and miles, stifling
     plaintive cries;
Hours discouraged, distracted—for the one I cannot
     content myself without, soon I saw him content
     himself without me;
Hours when I am forgotten, (O weeks and months are
     passing, but I believe I am never to forget!)
Sullen and suffering hours! (I am ashamed—but it is
     useless—I am what I am;)
Hours of my torment—I wonder if other men ever have
     the like, out of the like feelings?
Is there even one other like me—distracted—his friend,
     his lover, lost to him?
Is he too as I am now? Does he still rise in the morning,
     dejected, thinking who is lost to him? and at night,
     awaking, think who is lost?
Does he too harbor his friendship silent and endless?
     harbor his anguish and passion?
Does some stray reminder, or the casual mention of a
     name, bring the fit back upon him, taciturn and
     deprest?
Does he see himself reflected in me? In these hours,
     does he see the face of his hours reflected?

9

I dreamed in a dream, I saw a city invincible to the
     attacks of the whole of the rest of the earth,
I dreamed that was the new City of Friends,
Nothing was greater there than the quality of robust
     love—it led the rest,
It was seen every hour in the actions of the men of that
     city,
And in all their looks and words.

10

O you whom I often and silently come where you are,
     that I may be with you,
As I walk by your side, or sit near, or remain in the
     same room with you,
Little you know the subtle electric fire that for your sake
     is playing within me.

11

Earth! my likeness!
Though you look so impassive, ample and spheric
     there,
I now suspect that is not all;
I now suspect there is something fierce in you, eligible
     to burst forth;
For an athlete is enamoured of me—and I of him,
But toward him there is something fierce and terrible in
     me, eligible to burst forth,
I dare not tell it in words—not even in these songs.

12

To the young man, many things to absorb, to engraft, to
     develop, I teach, to help him become élève of mine,
But if blood like mine circle not in his veins,
If he be not silently selected by lovers, and do not
     silently select lovers,
Of what use is it that he seek to become élève of mine?

A Day in the Life of A Book Wizard (Cataloger)

A day in the life of a book wizard

This post is contributed by Kim Cull, McGehee Rare Book Librarian.

Today, we share a look into the life of a book wizard (cataloger) here in Special Collections. Cataloging is a very important job within all libraries because without catalogers, we would have a difficult time discovering what the library has available on their shelves. Cataloging is essentially the process of creating and maintaining bibliographic and authority records in the library catalog. Cataloger work with metadata, i.e. data about data. Here within Special Collections, our catalogers describe printed items from Gutenberg’s time all the way to the present. They see a lot of very interesting materials which anyone is welcome to come and use.

We will be spending the day with cataloger Kim Cull, but she is a tad camera shy. Because of this, she will be represented by one of our favorite American Girl dolls in miniature, Molly McIntire. If you did not know, Kim is primary cataloger for the McGehee Miniature Book Collection, hence the need for a miniature doll.

 

A miniature Molly McIntire standing in front of miscellaneous rare books.

A miniature Molly McIntire standing in front of miscellaneous rare books.

Today, we have caught Kim in the middle of cataloging a collection of children’s books given to us by Josephine Iselin. This collection is quite fun to catalog because first books have to be unboxed; plus, the illustrations are amazing! Each book is a delightful surprise and a mystery waiting to be discovered. Today, we get to look at A toad for Tuesday by Russell E. Erickson, Lothrop, Lee, & Shepard Co., New York, 1974. Step one in the cataloging process is making sure the book is supported in one of our book supports – yes, even staff have to use them.

Molly McIntire looking at, "A Toad for Tuesday," by Russell E. Erickson.

Molly McIntire looking at, “A Toad for Tuesday,” by Russell E. Erickson.

Next step in the cataloging process is to review the title page and then check to see if a copy already exists in the library. In the past, catalogers would check large filing cabinets filled with card catalogs. Today, catalogers do all of their cataloging and reference work with the computer using our online catalog. If there is an existing record in our local library, all that needs to be done is adding another call number for the Special Collections copy and then describing the item. If a record does not already exist, then the cataloger must search the wider, international catalog first and then create or download a record.

Molly McIntire looking at the computer screen.

Molly McIntire looking at the computer screen.

Cataloging is similar to coding or programming in the sense that we have specific numbered fields that correspond with different elements of a item being described. For instance, the title of the book gets transcribed into the 245 field, the publisher’s statement in the 264 field, and a description of the books binding in the 590 field. The more fields we add, the longer and hopefully better the record will be. We try to add tracings or subject headings in the 600 fields that can be used in searches to help patrons find what they are looking for.

Screen shot of the bibliographic record for, "A Toad for Tuesday."

Screen shot of the bibliographic record for, “A Toad for Tuesday.”

Once cataloging is completed, it is time to make the book shelf ready. In Special Collections, this means writing out the call number on a special bookplate and pasting it in the book. Then, we write the call number on a paper slip, add a barcode, and then send the book to the stacks for our students to shelve. Sometimes, the book gets boxed and sent to off-site storage, but never fear! All materials sent off-site can be retrieved within 72 hours.

The most important part in a cataloger’s day is their tea (or coffee) break. Catalogers are fueled by caffeine. It is also good to take a break from staring at computer screens. Once recharged, the cataloger begins the process all over again with another book.

Molly McIntire enjoying a cup of Earl Grey tea.

Molly McIntire enjoying a cup of Earl Grey tea.

Thank you for taking the time to read about our catalogers’ work. If you have any questions, they are happy to speak about their work.

Re-Digitizing the Holsinger Studio Collection for the 2022 Visions of Progress Exhibition

This post was contributed by Stacey Evans, senior imaging specialist and project coordinator in the Digital Production Group at the University of Virginia Library. 

Introduction

Visions of Progress: Portraits of Dignity, Style and Racial Uplift catalog cover featuring featuring a black-and-white photograph of an African American woman in a high-necked lace blouse and a floral hat, set against a dark background.

“Can we re-digitize a set of glass plate negatives of African American portraits from the Holsinger Studio Collection?” That question came from Curator of Exhibitions Holly Robertson as the Visions of Progress: Portraits of Dignity, Style and Racial Uplift exhibition approached in 2022 

The UVA Library’s Holsinger Studio Collection (MSS 9862) consists of approximately 10,000 wet-plate glass negatives and 500 celluloid negatives from the commercial studio of Rufus W. Holsinger—and later his son, Ralph—based in Charlottesville, Virginia. The unique collection includes 600 portraits of Africans Americans in central Virginia and offers insights into life in central Virginia from the late 19th century to the early twentieth century. 

I have known John Edwin Mason, the exhibition’s chief curator, since the early days of my freelance photography career in Charlottesville. I first encountered photographs from the Holsinger Studio Collection soon after moving to Charlottesville in 1996. Holsinger’s landscape photographs appear throughout the city, and, for Virginia Magazine assignments, I retraced his steps—pairing my contemporary images with his early twentieth-century views. 

In more recent years, I noticed Holsinger’s portraits reproduced on vinyl across Charlottesville on buildings and construction fences—a striking reminder of his enduring visual legacy. Joining the University Library in 2020, I was delighted to be in a position to revisit this collection in a new context. So, when the question of re-digitization arose, my answer was yes. As someone new to cultural heritage imaging and the process of digitizing glass plates, I began my research. 

The Holsinger Studio Collection was first digitized in the 1990s using flatbed scanners. Advances in digital imaging now allow us to capture significantly greater pixel detail and a wider tonal range. Re-digitizing the plates would not only enhance image quality but also provide researchers access to un-cropped versions that include portrait numbers corresponding to sitters’ names recorded in two fragile business ledgers held in the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library. 

Gallery view showing wall-mounted photographs, backlit photographs in windows, and display cases featuring African American portraits from the Holsinger Studio Collection.

2022 installation of the Visions of Progress exhibition in the Small Special Collections Library

Research & Production 

The primary sources for my research included the Federal Agencies Digitization Guidelines Initiative (FADGI), the Digital Transitions Transmissive Digitization Guide, and a blog post by TownsWeb Archiving. I hold a BFA in Photography from the Savannah College of Art and Design, earned in 1995. My early professional experience included positions as a newspaper lab technician and as a first assistant to an architectural photographer. During that time, I gained extensive experience converting slides and film negatives into digital files using drum and desktop film scanners. However, before this re-digitization, I had no prior experience working with glass plate negatives or using a digital camera system as the capture device—now the preferred approach in cultural heritage imaging. 

A screenshot from working with Capture One software showing a 4”x5” black-and-white film target and object, content, and speculative artist’s intent versions of two plates featuring African American women.

From the equipment available in our studio, I selected an XF Phase One camera with an 80-megapixel digital back and a 120mm macro lens, paired with Capture One Cultural Heritage software, a DT Film Stage table, a lightbox, and a sheet of glass to stabilize the plates. I began the workflow by creating a Lens Cast Correction (LCC) profile for the session, capturing the film stage and glass in position to ensure even illumination across the frame. Next, I photographed an Image Science Associates 4”x5” black-and-white film target to establish a baseline for exposure, white balance, and resolution. This target served as a reference for tonal consistency and system performance throughout the session.  

Once the setup was calibrated, we proceeded to photograph each plate (emulsion side up), adjusting the shutter speed as needed to compensate for the varying densities and contrast levels among the negatives. My objective was to produce an uncropped primary file that faithfully represented the full tonal range of each plate—retaining both highlight and shadow detail. In my research, I learned that there are typically three “versions” to consider when digitizing for archival purposes: object, content, and speculative artist’s intent. We decided to preserve both the object and speculative artist’s intent versions. 

From left to right is the library’s metadata catalog link, filename, title, caption, and a thumbnail of each image.

The two preservation formats of the Bill Hurley glass plate negative and associated metadata as shown in the UVA Library’s internal tracking system.

Interpreting artistic intent can be challenging when working with glass plates from a studio more than a century old. Fortunately, John had several original prints from the Holsinger Studio, and, when it came time to finalize the digital renderings, he joined me at the workstation as I fine-tuned images. I tend to prefer flatter tonal curves that preserve subtle detail giving printers more to work with, while John advocated for a bit more contrast based on his Holsinger prints in hand. We met in the middle, taking into consideration both our professional perspectives. 

The re-digitized glass plate of Jessie White, accessible through Virgo, shows two images of White, an African American woman, sitting slightly diagonal on a chair with print publications on her lap. Her hair is just below the ears and might be tied back. She wears a full-length white skirt with a white three-quarter length sleeve blouse. The blouse is embroidered with a pin, and a black rectangular shaped bow on toward the collar. Her left gaze is slightly off camera to the right, and the right image holds a more straightforward gaze.

A detail from the Holsinger Studio Ledger which tracks customers and their portrait purchases. From left to right is the date, the sitter’s name, identification number, and cost.

Each glass plate negative has an identification number etched into the emulsion of the plate. These numbers enabled us to identify portrait sitters based upon a ledger in the Holsinger Studio Collection that included the name of the sitter and how much they paid. For example, Jessie White (X02319) paid $1.00 for her photograph on May 25, 1914.

Working alongside me was Exhibitions Coordinator Jacquelyn Kim. She worked closely with John and Holly to select which portraits would be included and created a spreadsheet to record the corresponding metadata for each plate.  During the digitization sessions, she handled the plates with care, allowing me to focus entirely on image capture and adding the identification number to the metadata.  

Outcome  

A two-page catalog spread with text describing Bill Hurley’s life in Charlottesville and the speculative artist’s intent reproduction of Hurley’s glass plate, originally photographed in 1909 at the Holsinger Studio. Hurley is seated with a slight diagonal holding a lit match gazing directly at the camera with a cigarette in his mouth. He wears a hat, suit, vest, white shirt and tie and long pants.

The resulting images are beautifully reproduced in the exhibition catalog. We maintained the full frame of each plate, leaving a thin black border to assure researchers that no detail was omitted. The delicate textures of lace, the richness of skin tones, and the soft transitions in shadow and light all contribute to the dignity and depth of these portraits. Beyond their technical achievement, these re-digitized images strengthen the connection between the glass plates and the people they represent—linking descendants today with the stories of their ancestors’ portraits of dignity, style, and racial uplift. 

Although the exhibition has come and gone, the new files are accessible through the University of Virginia Library’s Virgo catalog. Forty portraits are featured in an exquisite catalog along with essays and descriptions of the plates. 

The re-digitization of the Holsinger Studio glass plates reflects the University of Virginia Library’s ongoing commitment to advancing cultural heritage imaging and digital preservation. I am grateful to have contributed to this work alongside dedicated colleagues who share a passion for both technical excellence and historical storytelling. 

A two-page catalog spread featuring photos and descriptions of the lives of Susie Smith and Harvey Foster. Smith is seated in a long coat and hat. Foster, dressed formally, stands beside a seated companion.

A Discovery and an Eclipse: Langston Hughes’ Rise to Fame

This post was written by Small Special Collections Library Curator George Riser.

At the age of 22, after leading a peripatetic existence, Langston Hughes moved to Washington, D.C., and took a job as a busboy at the Wardman Park Hotel. One day, he saw a notice announcing renowned poet Vachel Lindsay would be giving a reading in the hotel theater that evening. Hughes writes in his autobiography, The Big Sea (PS3515.U274 Z464 1940), “I very much wanted to hear him read his poems, but I knew they did not admit colored people to the auditorium.”

That afternoon, Hughes wrote out three of his poems—“The Weary Blues,” “Jazzonia,” and “Negro Dancers”—and placed them in the pocket of his busboy uniform. Again, from The Big Sea:

“In the evening when Mr. Lindsay came down to dinner, quickly I laid them beside his plate and went away, afraid to say anything to so famous a poet, except to tell him I like his poems and that these were poems of mine. The next morning on the way to work, as usual I bought a paper—and there I read that Vachel Lindsay had discovered a Negro bus boy poet! At the hotel the reporters were already waiting for me. They interviewed me. And they took my picture, holding up a tray of dirty dishes in the middle of the dining room. The picture, copyrighted by Underwood and Underwood, appeared in lots of newspapers throughout the country.”

Newsclipping. See caption.

Josephine Tighe Williams, “Discovery of a New Writer of Poetry Among Workers at a Washington Hotel,” Star, December 13, 1925. Papers of Vachel Lindsay (MSS 6259)

News page clipping featuring photo captioned "Langston Hughes, Washington's Bus Boy Poet"

Josephine Tighe Williams, “Discovery of a New Writer of Poetry Among Workers at a Washington Hotel,” Star, December 13, 1925. Papers of Vachel Lindsay (MSS 6259)

Lindsay’s “discovery” of Hughes introduced his works to a broader audience and helped him garner wider literary acclaim. However, by the time they first met in 1925, Hughes had already begun establishing his own reputation.

In fact, Hughes had published several poems in popular Black journals—such as Crisis, Opportunity, and Alain Locke’s guest-edited issue of Survey Graphic—and had signed a contract for his first bookIt was through his acquaintance with Locke that Hughes met Georgia Douglas Johnson, who hosted the S Street Salon in her home—a weekly gathering of celebrated poets, writers, and artists. There, Hughes met, among others, Zora Neale Hurston, Richard Bruce Nugent, and Carl Van Vechten, who sent some of Hughes’ poems to his publisher, Alfred A. Knopf. Not long after, Hughes received a letter from Blanche Knopf, Alfred’s wife and business partner, saying his poems had been accepted for publication.

Dust jacket for The Weary Blues, featuring a person's silhouette against a bold red background looking at a mounted fixture emitting a circle of warm yellow light.

Dust jacket designed by Miguel Covarrubias. Langston Hughes, The Weary Blues (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1926). Clifton Waller Barrett Library (PS3515.U274 W4 1926)

The Weary Blues (PS3515.U274 W4 1926), Hughes’ first published book of poetry, came out the following year in 1926. It would not be long before Langston Hughes would become one of the most influential and celebrated poets of the Harlem Renaissance and beyond, eclipsing the fame of his early advocate, Vachel Lindsay.

Shown here are five typed and signed poems Langston Hughes sent to Vachel Lindsay at his address in Spokane, Washington. Marks made by Lindsay in black ink are visible on the pages. These poems are found in Box 65 of the Papers of Nicholas Vachel Lindsay (MSS 6259) in the Clifton Waller Barrett Collection of American Literature.

The Philip Slaughter Daybook Treatment, Part 1

The Philip Slaughter Daybook Treatment, Part 1 

To Wash a Manuscript 

 By: Sue Donovan, Conservator for Special Collections.

Sue Donovan, Conservator for Special Collections, is currently engaged in a long-term, intricate treatment that you might be able to see as you walk past the Special Collections Conservation Lab in Shannon Library for the next few months. On the bench is the Philip Slaughter Daybook (MSS 6556), dating from 1808-1816, which is a manuscript written in iron gall ink. A daybook is a recording of daily information for a given location, and the term is often seen for a plantation logbook in the 1800s. The Slaughter Daybook is such a manuscript and recounts the day-to-day purchases and events of a plantation in Culpeper County, Va. One of Sue’s favorite entries is the recipe for soothing rheumatism: it involves placing earthworms inside a stoppered vial within bread dough and then cooking it all together. This results in steamed earthworm juice that you can rub on your aching knees, and a fresh loaf of bread! A true two-birds-one-stone situation.  

A beige book on a black background. The first page is completely detached and placed to the left of the main textblock. There is black handwriting on all pages. The edges are ragged and have many losses.

The Philip Slaughter Daybook, before treatment.

 The daybook was acquired by UVA Library Special Collections in 2018 and was brought to the attention of Preservation Services in 2023/24. Because the book was written in iron gall ink and was bound with a sewing method that put severe strain on the paper, the manuscript was in poor shape. Iron gall ink is a type of writing media that was in widespread use from the Middle Ages up until the early 20th century. It is made with three main components: iron (metal salts), tannic acid, and gum arabic. Other ingredients could be (and were) added, and proportions and recipes for ink were highly variable. Iron gall ink had originally been made for use with parchment, a durable and relatively alkaline writing surface made from animal skins, for which it was beneficial for the ink to “bite” into the parchment. When paper started to be used as a writing surface hundreds of years later, that ink’s capacity to bite became a slow-motion tragedy for many manuscripts.  

Over time, iron gall ink can actually eat through the paper, causing letters to drop out or whole lines of text to crack.  The Philip Slaughter Daybook was unfortunately a victim of what conservators call “inherent vice,” due to the iron and acids in the ink, and every page of the manuscript had instances of drop through.  

A beige sheet of paper with brownish-black ink that has a hole in it, made visible by a white background under the beige paper.

A letter that has “dropped through.”

In addition, the paper used for the manuscript, while it was originally a relatively good quality paper, had degraded over time and was discolored and acidic. Acidic environments can speed up the degradation of iron gall ink, and metal ions can accelerate the deterioration of paper, so the manuscript needed an intervention that would arrest deterioration and allow researchers and staff members to use the daybook safely.  

Calcium phytate treatment is a multi-step process that reduces the metal ions and the acidity in the paper. The treatment requires multiple baths in different chemicals, which is not without risks, but comes with undeniable rewards as well. The first part of the treatment requires bathing the paper in deionized water to remove acidic degradation products and water-soluble metal ions.  

Three beakers containing water are shown against a white paper background. The first beaker is quite yellow, the second beaker is slightly yellow, and the third beaker appears almost completely clear.

The conservator uses beakers of water from each subsequent bath to determine the effectiveness of washing the pages. The first bath removes a high quantity of acidic degradation products, as seen in the first beaker on the left, which is quite yellow. Each following bath is less yellow, which shows that the acidity is being washed away.

In the second part of the treatment, the manuscript pages are washed in a solution of calcium phytate, which complexes free radical metal ions and changes them into water-soluble particles that can be washed away. If the free radicals were allowed to stay in the paper, they would continue to cause damage. Making them water soluble and washing them out thus improves the long-term life of the paper. During this stage of the treatment, testing strips made in-house from a chemical called bathophenanthroline help determine if the metal ions are being complexed and taken out of solution. Every 10-20 minutes a folio is removed from the Calcium Phytate bath, lightly rinsed, and then a specific area of written text is tested. Using plastic tweezers because metal tweezers can cause a false positive, a drop of acetic acid is placed on the testing strip, which will turn pink if metal ions are present. If the strip is very pink, the folio is returned to the bath in a different location, e.g. underneath another folio if it had previously been floating on the top.  

Conservator Sue Donovan, a white woman with brown hair wearing a denim button-up top and black gloves, gently manipulates a folio from the Philip Slaughter Daybook in the calcium phytate bath.

Conservator Sue Donovan gently manipulates gently manipulates a folio from the Philip Slaughter Daybook in the calcium phytate bath.

Once the testing strips are mostly white, the paper is deacidified in a bath of calcium bicarbonate, a solution made with calcium carbonate, deionized water, and a water carbonator. An exterior size of 0.5 % gelatine is brushed onto the paper to provide more protection against metal ions and to restore sizing that was lost during the washing. Finally, the pages are allowed to air dry for one hour, and then they are placed under blotters, felts, and light weight to dry.  

With the curators in Small Special Collections Library, Sue discussed how the benefits to washing the manuscript would outweigh the risks of the treatment. The time this treatment needs is a significant factor in weighing whether to proceed: It takes about 6-8 hours to complete all steps of the calcium phytate treatment for one batch of documents, not counting the drying time in the felts. Four folios are washed during one session, and the solutions have to be made either the night before or the day of treatment. Overall, Sue estimates that the treatment will likely take over 150 hours for the washing steps alone.  

Luckily, Sue has discovered that applying pre-made mending strips to damp (not soaking) pages significantly cuts down on mending time, which goes to show that innovations are being made every day!  

Picture of a pair of tweezers holding a translucent strip of paper above the surface of a wet iron gall ink document.

A mending strip held above the wet surface of the iron gall ink document.

While it is a long treatment, it will be satisfying to accomplish. The washed pages are brighter and more legible, as seen in the first two batches of folios that were washed as a trial. Furthermore, once the pages are washed and metal ions are removed, mending materials applied with more water can be used, which means stronger but also faster application. Mending iron gall ink documents that haven’t been washed can be quite slow and tedious, since conservators must limit the amount of moisture used during the application of wheat starch paste typically used in paper conservation. The Slaughter Daybook, therefore, can be more safely handled and more strongly conserved because of the steps taken to wash the acids and the metal ions out of the paper.  

Once the washing and mending are done, the manuscript will need to be bound back together, but that will be addressed in another blogpost! The overall goal for the daybook is for it to be used safely in the reading room, but in the meantime, the manuscript has been fully digitized to facilitate access to the content within. Make sure to check out what Sue and colleagues Nicole and Melanie are up to in the lab when you walk by Shannon 200!  

Beyond Making the Grade: Student and Life success at UVA (in 1854 and 2022)

As students approach their final exams for the Fall of 2022, Manuscript and Archives
processor Ellen Welch is pleased to share an original letter from a new acquisition of the Bennett Taylor Papers (MSS 9221), written in 1854 from a father giving advice to his son, a University of Virginia student. These letters were donated by Elizabeth Kirk Page—a descendant of the Jefferson and Randolph family—to the Small Special Collections Library in October 2018.

The letter was written by John Charles Randolph Taylor (1812-1875) to his son Bennett Taylor (1836-1898), a student in February 1854. Taylor is also a great-great-grandson of Thomas Jefferson through his mother Martha “Patsy” Jefferson Randolph Taylor, (1817-1857). Mr. Taylor advises Bennett to engage in student learning that extends beyond test scores and grades.

I love the advice in this letter because it reminds me of how my father used to counsel me when I was a college student—telling me to savor my years of learning as if I were drinking a fine glass of wine! While we may forget a test score, we remember personal and meaningful connections with faculty, students, and academic concepts for a lifetime. As the University community nears the end of this semester, it is good to focus on those connections that can enrich your life forever.

“My dearest Boy,

I received your letter of the 10th & again your letter of the 13th. I am not

disappointed at your finding the examinations harder than you expected. I do not think

success at the University at all necessary to our future success in life. The main object

to be aimed at in after life, it seems to me, is to be good & useful & to perform faithfully

& diligently the duties which accident & your own inclination point out to you. A certain

amount of this world’s goods is necessary to every man. This amount is always attain-

able by every industrious man who does not allow himself to be led away by the temp-

tations which surround him. The mode & manner of attaining this independence

must always depend upon the circumstances of natural talent, capacity for

study, & consequent acquirement, which belong to the individual. Success at college

is often injurious because the recipient of college honors is often inclined to rest

on his [ears]! I look upon the knowledge acquired during your college life of your own

self, as not the least important result which is to be attained. It will be a great

pleasure to me, I confess, for you to graduate with credit in your different classes, &

I still hope that you will be able to do so, by using due diligence. Your after course,

in entering upon the success of life, must as you must see, depend on the

amount of knowledge which you may acquire, & the training which your mind

will receive, during the next four years, & it is most important to you to bring

out your full capacity during that time. My impression is that you ought not

to be discouraged by the late examinations, but that you ought to devote yourself

with all your powers, & systematically, to Latin, French, & Spanish, & endeavor to

make yourself a good graduate in each of these classes at the present session.

In your Greek & Mathematical classes, I would give them sufficient study to insure my

standing well in them in the recitation room and [exam], & give all my extra time to the

three first named, if I were you. If you have not written to me, write to say how

you found the examinations in French & Spanish- & also, the examination in

mathematics, when that takes places. Write to me what you think of my suggestion

about your studies…”

Your most affectionate father

J.C.R. Taylor

Bennett Taylor graduated from the University of Virginia, became a Lieutenant Colonel in the American Civil War, and survived being a prisoner at Johnson Island in Lake Erie, New York. He was a clerk for the Circuit Court, a Justice for the Peace, a Town Magistrate, an attorney, and a husband and father of six children. While he was far from being wealthy—in fact, he struggled to pay his rent—by all known accounts he had a rich and fulfilling life. The Bennett Taylor papers include letters from his grandmother Jane Hollins Randolph (1798-1871), and his great aunt Ellen Wayles Coolidge (1796-1876), granddaughter of Thomas Jefferson.

Some of the letters can also be read online created via Monticello and the Thomas Jefferson Foundation.

Bennett Taylor also collected autographed comments of friendship and signatures from his Kappa Alpha brothers and fellow students at the University of Virginia in an autograph album which is also in our University Archives collection (RG-30/17/1.821).

Check out the related Edgehill Randolph family collection (MSS 5533-e)—these collections give a close-up view of the attitudes and lives of people that lived in our town during another time, sharing past knowledge into our present.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Herbarium Pictum: 2022 Historic Garden Week in Virginia

Each April, we celebrate Historic Garden Week in Virginia. Next week—April 23-30, 2022—private landscapes, public gardens, and historic sites across Virginia will offer tours showcasing our beautiful state at the peak of spring.

In this post by Manuscripts and Archives Processor Ellen Welch, you’ll enjoy just a sampling of images from our collection, Herbarium Pictum (MSS 38-618) which contains five volumes of illustrated watercolors of flowers, plants, fungi, and trees painted by Erdmann Christianus Seyffert, 1743-1757. Special thanks to Heather Moore Riser for suggesting this collection and Whitney Buccicone for the blog idea.

The illustrations are numbered and labeled with their scientific (Latin and Greek) names. The end of volume five includes an index with the names and classifications from Carl Linneaeus (1707-1778), a Swedish botanist, zoologist, taxonomist, and physician who formalized binomial nomenclature, the modern system of naming organisms. The first part of the name, the generic name, identifies the genus to which the species belongs, and the second part is the specific name of the species. The first letter of the generic name is capitalized, and the species is in lowercase. Both names are italicized. The descriptions of the plants have been added to this blog for further identification but are not part of the collection. These watercolor illustrations painted so long ago are beautifully detailed and it is our privilege to share them with you.

The five volumes of Herbarium Pictum—each in a grey paper wrapper with handwritten lettering on the spines.

Herbarium Pictum (MSS 38-618): five volumes of illustrated watercolors of flowers, plants, fungi, and trees painted by Erdmann Christianus Seyffert, 1743-1757.

Aloe americana folio triangula maculoso flore

Aloe americana folio triangula maculoso flore

 

Aloe americana folio triangula maculoso flore

Aloe, also written Aloë, is a genus (Asphodelacea) containing over 560 species of flowering succulent plants. The most widely known species is Aloe vera, or “true aloe” which is known for healing wounds and treating skin problems.  It is native to tropical and southern Africa, Madagascar, Jordan, and the Arabian Peninsula, as well as various islands in the Indian Ocean.

 

 


Aster minensis lyngeneora Aster minensis lyngeneora (Greek and Latin name for Star)

According to one version in Greek mythology, the aster was created by the tears of the Greek goddess, Astraea, at seeing violence on earth. She became upset and asked to be turned into a star. From the heavens, she saw what happened to earth and wept. Her tears fell to the ground and turned into star-shaped flowers. For this reason, asters were named after her. Asters provide habitat and late-season food for pollinators.

 


Lavatera trimestris 

Lavatera, a native flower of Spain and Syria, is in the family Malvaceae and is a cousin of hibiscus and hollyhock. It was named after 17th century Swiss botanist, J. R. Lavatera. It was referred to as Spanish Summer Mallow.

 

 

 

 


Amaranthus caudatusAmaranthus caudatus 

Also called Love-lies-bleeding, Tassell flower, and Velvet flower. Many parts of the plant, including the leaves and seeds, are edible, and are used as a source of food in India and South America. In the Victorian language of flowers, Love-lies-bleeding means hopeless love.

 

 

 


Impatiens balsamina Impatiens balsamina

Known also as Balsam, Garden balsam, Rose balsam, Touch-me-not or Spotted snapweed, Impatiens is a species of plant native to India and Myanmar. Juice from the leaves is used to treat warts, snakebites, rheumatism, fractures, and other ailments.

 

 

 


Amaryllis formosissima hexandria Amaryllis formosissima hexandria  

First known in Europe in 1593, Amaryllis are from South America according to Swedish botanist, Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778).

 

 

 

 

 


Hyacinthus orientalus Hyacinthus orientalus 

Hyacinthus are native to Turkey, Syria, Lebanon and Israel. In the 16th century they became very popular and were imported to many European countries. The first known mention of Hyacinth is in Homer’s Iliad which dates to approximately 762 BCE.

 

 

 


Cereus cactus grandiflorus Cereus cactus grandiflorus

Grandiflorus means “large flowered”in Latin. Carl Linnaeus described this cactus in 1753 as the largest flowered species of cacti known. It is also called Queen of the Night.

 

 

 

 


Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleracea

Brassica oleracea is a plant species that includes many common cultivars, such as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, kale, brussels sprouts, collard greens, Savoy cabbage, kohlrabi, and gai lan.

 

 

 

 


Cichorium intybusCichorium intybus

Known as chicory, it is a woody, perennial herbaceous plant of the daisy family Asteraceae, featuring bright blue flowers. It can be used as a coffee substitute and food additive.

 

 

 

 


Datura fastuosa (Devil’s Trumpet)Datura fastuosa (Devil’s Trumpet)

Datura is a poisonous, vespertine-flowering plant belonging to the family Solanacea.  Also called thornapples, jimsonweeds, devil trumpets, moonflower, devil’s weed, and hell’s bells, they have psychoactive properties, and can cause arrhythmias, fever, hallucinations, psychoses, and even death if taken internally. It has been associated with witchcraft in the western world.

 

 


Papaver somniferumPapaver somniferum

Papaver somniferum, commonly known as the opium poppy or breadseed poppy. It probably originated in the eastern Mediterranean region but is now naturalized across much of Europe and Asia.

 

 

 

 


Tulipae gesnerianae

Tulipae gesnerianae

Tulipa gesneriana, also known as the Didier’s tulip or Garden tulip, is a species of plant in the lily family. It is believed to have originated in Turkey although tulips are the national flower of Holland.

 

 

 

 


Tropaeoli minerisTropaeoli mineris

A species of flowering plant in the family Tropaeolacea, originating in the Andes from Bolivia north to Colombia. The current genus name Tropaeolum, coined by Carl Linnaeus, meaning “little trophy”(in Latin), and borrowed from Ancient Greek “trophy.”

 

 

 


Agaricus mucariusAgaricus mucarius

Bright red fly agaric mushroom, also known as Amanita muscaria, from northern Europe and Asia.  It can contain the psychoactive chemical compound muscarine. “No mushroom has gathered unto it more folklore and mythology than this white-spotted fairytale fungus. It may well be that Lewis Carrol had experienced the hallucinatory effects of Amanita muscaria. In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Alice eats part of one side of a mushroom and grows shorter; a piece from the other side would make her taller.” Agaricus is a remedy for twitches, jerks, tics, cramps, and convulsions.


Morchella crassipes persoon (Thick-footed morel)Morchella crassipes persoon (Thick-footed morel)

A morel with a conic fertile portion having deep and irregular pits. The generic name Morchella is said to come from “morchel,” an old German word meaning “mushroom.” Morels are edible mushrooms appreciated worldwide for their savory flavor. They have also been used in medicines for centuries.

 

 


Thelephora hirsuta persoonThelephora hirsuta persoon

Fruit bodies of this mushroom are leathery, usually brownish at maturity, and range in shape from coral-like tufts to having distinct caps. Almost all species in the genus are thought to be inedible.

 

 

 

 


Helvella infula persoonHelvella infula persoon

Helvella is an ascomycete fungus from the genus Gyromitra which is widely distributed across Europe and North America. It normally fruits in sandy soils under coniferous trees in spring and early summer. The mushroom is an irregular brain-shaped cap that is dark brown in color. It can be poisonous, if eaten raw or not cooked properly.

 

 


Morchella patula persoonMorchella patula persoon

Morchella is a type of morel. Morels are a feature of many cuisines. Their unique flavor is prized by chefs worldwide. They have many species names which have been disputed for over a century.

 

 

 

 


Juniperus communis (tree)Juniperus communis (tree)

The common juniper is a species of small tree or shrub in the cypress (Cupressaceae) family. This evergreen conifer has the largest geographical range of any woody plant. The cones are used to flavor certain beers and gin. The word “gin” derives from an Old French word meaning “juniper.” The berries are also used in the ales of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Latvia. They have been used as medicine by many cultures including the Navajo people.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Small Special Collections Library: Re-Opening Update

We are open for in-person research appointments, online reference assistance, and instruction sessions for the UVA community.

We are open for in-person research appointments, online reference assistance, and instruction sessions for the UVA community.

For the safety of our community, the Small Special Collections Library will be re-opening on Tuesday, September 8 with the following precautions in place: 

  • Our building and reading room is open only by appointment to UVA ID holders.
  • Our exhibitions are closed. Find a trove of past exhibitions online: explore.lib.virginia.edu/exhibits/

To make an in-person research appointment (available only to UVA ID holders), please visit cal.lib.virginia.edu/appointments/small.  Research appointments will be available:

Monday 1:00-5:00pm
Tuesday 8:30am-12:30pm
Wednesday 8:30am-12:30pm and 1:00-5:00pm
Thursday 1:00-5:00pm
Friday-Sunday CLOSED

Researchers are limited to one 4-hour appointment or two 2-hour appointments each week. Registration and material requests must be made prior to your appointment in order to allow adequate retrieval time. Per University Policy SEC-045, face coverings are to be worn at all times while in the Library. A personal water bottle is permitted and must be left outside of the reference room. All other food and drink must remain outside. 

Harrison/Small entry stairwell

Researchers are limited to one 4-hour appointment or two 2-hour appointments each week. Registration and material requests must be made prior to your appointment in order to allow adequate retrieval time.

We are conducting both in-person and remote Special Collections sessions for UVA classes during the fall 2020 semester. For more information or to schedule a session, please visit: https://www.library.virginia.edu/services/class-visits-and-instruction

At this time we are able to offer online reference assistance, but we are prioritizing the needs of the University of Virginia students, faculty, and staff. We will not be able to respond to reference requests from those outside the UVa community until December 1, 2020. For more information about our current online reference assistance guidelines and response times, visit: https://small.library.virginia.edu/services/reference-request/

Services to provide high-resolution digital scans of Special Collections materials are limited. If you have the information for the item you need scanned, proceed directly to the Digitization Services Request Form.

Coming Soon: A New Special Collections Request System!

New flexibility. New look. New procedures.

On Wednesday, May 15, 2019, the Albert & Shirley Small Special Collections Library will launch a new online request and material circulation system.

The Special Collections Request System is an automated request and workflow management software specifically designed for special collections libraries and archives. This new system will improve how researchers register and request materials held by the Small Special Collections Library.

Stay tuned for more information about how our new request system will serve you on Wednesday!